Sunday, June 21, 2015

Mission Who?

Who gave MissionOne the authority 
to waive training and experience for 
Teacher Aides?



Englewood is switching Referral Companies that provides Paraprofessional to our School District's Classrooms. The ad is more polished than Delta T. No posters have been seen on telephone poles in Newark, yet.
Okay, does getting bought out by the same giant company that acquired Source4Teachers and other for profit organizations mean that Teacher Aides will get better training along with the 401K. Training in Special Education, not required. Since when. We are a Title I School District.
Training is most certainly required.
How long will it take us to realize and use our power. In the last Board Meeting, I watched Howard Haughton force Molly-Craig Berry to change her vote and vote the SEEK way.
This is the 2nd time we have watched Molly Craig-Berry cave in and vote other than the way she felt in her heart. Remember that in November. Perhaps Molly does not have the strength or fortitude that is required to stand up to those men even when the best interests of her own children are at stake. They all continuously ignore the law which says that a School District with more than 40% free and reduced lunch children is a Title I School District. EPSD is over 70% free and reduced lunch. If we are not a Title I School District, why are we still taking the Title I Federal Funds? By law we, as a Title I School District SHALL follow the dictates of the attached Legislation approved January 16, 2010.
Stay informed. Read the very detailed explanation of how PARAPROFESSIONALS/CLASSROOM TEACHER AIDES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PREPARED...Following these dictates will help all children succeed Academically, even the children of the privileged.
AN ACT concerning certain teaching paraprofessionals and 2 supplementing Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes.
ftp://www.njleg.state.nj.us/20082009/AL09/227_.PDF

Friday, July 25, 2014

The Great Push Back!

July 22, 2014

Feds will investigate “One Newark”

PULSENJ’s Sharon Smith
The deeply flawed state school reorganization plan known as “One Newark” faces a federal investigation. In response to a detailed request for a probe from PULSE New Jersey, a parent activist group founded by Johnny Lattner and Sharon Smith, the U.S. Department of Education will determine whether the plan–which has confused the lives of thousands of city children and their parents–violates the civil rights of Newark parents.
Lattner and Smith, joined by national Journey for Justice director Jitu Brown, will announced the details of the investigation Wednesday at noon during a press conference scheduled for the steps of City Hall.
“We made the case that One Newark’ discriminates against children, parents, and teachers, especially in the South Ward,” said Smith, who has been working on bringing the feds into Newark for months.

Smith says she hopes the investigation, authorized by Title 6 of the federal Civil Rights statute, will be prelude to suspending the “One Newark” plan and replacing it  with what Brown calls “sustainable school transformation.”

Brown’s organization is an umbrella group seeking to stop the mass closing of public schools and their replacement by corporate-driven, privately-operated charters and voucher schools. It includes, not just representatives of Newark, but also groups representing parents in Camden, Jersey City, and Paterson, like Newark, state-operated school districts that have tried to force school privatization on unwilling parents.

Smith says she expects the federal investigation to focus on three schools in Newark–Hawthorne Avenue, Bragaw Avenue, and Roseville Avenue. Cami Anderson, the state-imposed schools superintendent in Newark,  has concentrated on schools in the city’s South Ward.

Anderson has a special relationship with leaders of TEAM Academy Charter Schools and had hoped to turn virtually the entire South Ward over to the privately-operated charter school, part of the national KIPP charter school chain.

Parent activists–especially at Hawthorne–have worked against Anderson’s plans. Its principal, H. Grady James, has so far refused to apply for his own job at Hawthorne, contending the school–the highest achieving elementary school in the district–doess not need to be subjected to Anderson’s renewal plans.

Title Six of the Civil Rights act forbids any agency receiving federal funds–and the Newark schools receive federal funds–from discriminating on the basis of race. The federal government’s website explains:

“If a recipient of federal assistance is found to have discriminated and voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, the federal agency providing the assistance should either initiate fund termination proceedings or refer the matter to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal action. Aggrieved individuals may file administrative complaints with the federal agency that provides funds to a recipient, or the individuals may file suit for appropriate relief in federal court. Title VI itself prohibits intentional discrimination. However, most funding agencies have regulations implementing Title VI that prohibit recipient practices that have the effect of discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin.”

PULSENJ–”Parents Unified for Local School Education”–has been working quietly “in the background,” says Smith, as parents in Newark protested Anderson’s plans–backed by Gov. Chris Christie–to privatize Newark schools.

“We were looking for the appropriate legal action to show that the plan discriminated against people of color,” she said.

PULSENJ filed the complaint against “One Newark” May 13, as part of its commemoration of the 6oth anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling that outlawed school segregation. The organization wrote:

In a letter to Holder and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the organizations ask for an immediate investigation.

“Education ‘reformers’ and privatizers are targeting neighborhood schools filled with children of color, and leaving behind devastation. By stealth, seizure, and sabotage, these corporate profiteers are closing and privatizing our schools, keeping public education for children of color, not only separate, not only unequal, but increasingly not public at all.”

Jitu Brown explained that federal education law encouraged discrimination and privatization by allowing the privatization of public schools as a consequence of school failure. Journey for Justice, the umbrella organization he heads, persuaded the federal government to add yet anther possible outcome of school failure–”sustainable school transformation,” the replacement of failing public schools with community schools that have adequate resources to ensure student success.

Brown says he hopes a a finding of discrimination will allow the development of community schools based on that model.

“What has been lacking–not only in Newark, but also in places like Chicago, New York, and New Orleans–is community input to help develop plans for successful public schools. We have been faced with top-down education policies that have failed because they lack input from the people who are most affected,” says Brown.

This is true not only in Newark, Brown says, but also in Chicago, New York, and Washington, DC.

Brown pointed out the reforms in these towns have been based, not on providing resources to the schools, but on opening up private markets to entrepreneurs.

“The programs are test driven and narrow,” says Brown.  “Teachers don’t receive the resources they need. Kids are treated like criminals. If parents complain they don’t receive the wrap-around services their children need, they are accused of stealing.”

Courtesy: "State_NAACP_Ed_Committee" group.


                                             How are the Children?

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Lines 3, 4 & 5! Keep Public Education Alive


Legal Requirements

To become a member of a local board of education in New Jersey, you must—

    • Be able to read and write
    • Hold U.S. citizenship and one year’s residency in the school district
    • Be registered to vote in the district before filing the nominating petition
    • Have no interest in any contract with, or claim against, the board
    • Not hold office as mayor or member of the municipal governing body or, in the case of county school  
        districts, the county governing body
    • Not simultaneously hold two elective offices
    • Not be disqualified from membership for the conviction of certain crimes. (Within 30 days of election
        or appointment to the board, a member must undergo a criminal history background investigation
        through the state Department of Education.)

The following is a list of Candidates for the School Board in Englewood, New Jersey.

Election Day is Tuesday, April 16, 2013 
Polls shall be open between the hours of 5 and 9 p.m. and during any additional time which the school board may designate between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. (19:15-2)

1. Stephen Brown (incumbent, has served 3 terms already)
2. ______________
3.  Devry Pazant
4.  Junius "Jeff " Carter
5.  Carol Feinstein
6.  Amy Ginsberg
7.  Glenn Garrison (incumbent, has served 3 terms already)

Debra Richardson-Zarate is no longer running for a seat on the Englewood Board of Education. Line #2 is now empty.

            Lines 3, 4 and 5! Keep Public Education Alive!

For more information about how to become a New Jersey school Board member, please click here... http://www.njsba.org/about/candidacy/nominating-petitions/njsba-april-candidacy-faq.pdf


Thursday, January 10, 2013

Looking Back on Tragedy: Please Learn From It!

Exit to Knickerbocker Rd.
A few weeks ago as I was leaving an event at our high school, I became engaged in a conversation with 3rd Ward Councilman Eugene Skurnick who found that he could not use the walkway by Manor Rd to return home. He was forced to take the long way back or jump the fence. He argued that it was a necessary precaution to keep the students in the building safe from outside dangers. I disagreed with him, because it was clear that we were standing in the middle of a designated "Fire Lane" no parking. When the conversation was over, Mr. Skurnick walked his way, Ms. Satterfield went to her vehicle and I climbed into mine.

We both realized that we had a pileup in the rear of DMHS, because the gate to exit onto Knickerbocker Rd. was also padlocked. The new Assistant Superintendent was added to the group as she also tried to leave the campus. All three cars made the U turn and went back the other way. In the meantime, a school bus came around the building and maneuvered its way into the space between the picnic tables and the school building to wait. I got out of my car and took photos of the Manor Rd. gate and walkway. The Assistant Superintendent stopped when she saw me. I walked over to her car and told her what I was doing. She is new. She just smiled. First impressions.

Needless to say, I was upset. I had spoken up several times in 2011
Street & walk exit to Manor Rd.
about the fact that controlling the traffic in this one way in, only way out fashion is an invitation to disaster. Did anyone pause to think that this doubles the traffic across a roadway with children crossing? I was  previously upset because of the unwieldy way a fire engine would have to navigate the campus in case of a fire emergency. The Board, of course, has always sat dispassionately and with no response to any suggestion that this is dangerous to students.

This article was originally planned for publication before Christmas. When I returned home, I was distracted by the events that had transpired that  fateful Friday morning. That afternoon the television news was alive with the events in Newton, Connecticut. I did not post my objection to the perpetual lock down at the high school, because of these developments. The events at Sandy Hook Elementary were large in comparison to my complaint about the situation at DMHS.


In the meantime, I remembered that in August of 1967 when I registered at DMHS there was still in the center hallway a Memoriam for a student killed on the roadway between the south building and the north. It caught my eye, because of the way they spelled memoriam with a "u" instead of an "a". It actually forced me to check my dictionary. I was a new kid in a high school, that everyone kept reminding me, was a better school than my all black segregated school down south. The student's name was Mary Binder and she was the daughter of Otto Binder and the niece of Jack Binder who were really big in the comic book industry. Jack actually owned a studio located in a barn in Englewood where some of the early comic writers and artists convened to work after classes at Pratt Institute. She was crossing the street and dropped her books. The driver did not see her. She was hit and her chest was crushed against her books beneath the car there on the roadway between the 2 buildings. I often wonder why the school community chooses to forget that tragedy. It is a puzzle as to why they continue to place students in a situation where this is likely to happen again. I worry about my granddaughter crossing that roadway and dropping her book or purse. 


Last year, my granddaughter complained that the gate across the brook behind the Middle School was locked in the Am after school begins. Any students who are late become even later, because they are forced to walk back to Tryon Avenue and walk down to where they may go up the hill across the soccer field to the building. Has anyone ever timed that walk? Yes. One does become significantly later to school after such a detour. It is said that this gate is locked in order to keep outsiders off the campus and to keep the students in. The gate to the walkway and street in the rear of the castle by Manor Rd. is also said to be locked in order to keep outsiders off the campus. Perpetual Lock down. The gate to exit onto Knickerbocker Road is also said to be locked to keep students from leaving the campus or outsiders from entering during school hours.

Meanwhile, where are the security guards? Should they not be outside where they make sure no one enters the buildings proper? Is this really secure when the entire south and eastern entrances are totally open to anyone wishing to have access to the campus?

A driver must enter one way and then turn around and go out the same way pass an area where students cross on foot all day long. Hello people. This doubles the automobile traffic pass the point where Mary Binder was crushed beneath the car. What are you thinking? Traffic should be able to exit at either Manor Rd  or Knickerbocker Road in the rear of the building. Forcing cars and buses to turn around and exit pass where students are on foot is just plain crazy. It is an invitation to disaster. We have been lucky that no other child has dropped his/her books and gone unnoticed. I fail to understand why school officials have not noticed or shown concern that this is a problem and that children are not safe.

I assume that when buses line up at 4 pm to take the School Choice Students back to their home Communities that they are allowed to exit the campus via the rear building onto Knickerbocker Road.

Next. The Englewood Fire Department. Yeah fellows. Why have you not given the school board citations for this? I was told that in a fire emergency the security guards will remove the padlock on the gate leading out onto Knickerbocker Road. Whew! Have you guys ever heard of unforeseen circumstances? What happens if security guards are unable to do this? No one has a crystal ball and is able to predict that circumstances will always be the same. What if there are problems on both sides of the building?

Suggestion: 
Put one of those manned Security guard booths in the rear of the building or the front. That way, a log may be kept of the goings and comings of everyone who enters and exits the campus. That way the amount of traffic present around students crossing from building to building is cut in half.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Binder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Binder#Final_years_and_death
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Binder_(comics)   older brother Jack had a studio in a barn in Englewood, New Jersey

Friday, January 4, 2013

ESEA, An Endangered Species: Integrated Public Education Is Gasping For Air


The Elementary Secondary Education Act was signed into law April 11, 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson as part of his War on Poverty.  ESEA was originally supposed to be re-authorized every 5 years. It was overhauled and reauthorized in 2001 by the George W. Bush administration. Bush renamed the Act No Child Left Behind or NCLB. NCLB has been under attack ever since. States felt that impossible goals were written into the Act. In other words, many people thought that Bush set us all up for failure. (That idea is debatable. I wonder why the mandate to have all students Reading and Writing at 100%  by 2014 was not changed to a more reasonable objective without chucking the entire project. I mean, it is not like everyone followed the dictates of NCLB anyway. Regardless of what they said, I know that most folks never complied with many of the mandates that were designed to help students succeed. This practice will not change with the waivers, because the problem has always been that the Government sets up scenarios that they will never enforce.) President Obama's Administration has given waivers to over half the states in the Union including New Jersey. The average American wants to know how this affects them.

Districts with more than 40% free and reduced lunch children are considered Title I and are the recipients of federal funds under ESEA. Englewood has roughly 70% free and reduced lunch so our district receives Title I funds. Think of it this way, if your child receives free and reduced lunch at school, they qualify for help from the Federal Government. This includes tutoring, lunches, breakfast and other services and programs that aid students in completing high school, going to college and finding a career. If your children have special needs and/or are English Language Learners, they also benefit from these funds.
  • Children of poverty.
  • Children in rural areas.
  • children who are Native Americans.
  • children who are neglected and delinquent
  • children who are migrants
  • children who are homeless
  • children who are learning English
  • children impacted by disasters
  • children who are disabled.
Some states, including good old New Jersey have created waivers that exempt them from many of the mandates of ESEA. The students that ESEA was designed to help may end up suffering in the name of reform. An Example...from Englewood.  Paraprofessionals were a valued part of the pupil support system. The Waiver gives districts and RACs more freedom in the allocation of Title I funds.

A little history of The Elementary Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) 
Follow some of the links below in order to learn about ESEA and the way it was. That way, it will be easier to understand what is being taken away.
This is the Obama Administrations proposal for Improvement of ESEA?
ESEA may be interpreted as a type of financial aid for Elementary and Secondary students. Every household is required to fill out the form that qualifies students for free and reduced lunch. Keep in mind that some families never fill out this long and cumbersome form that may be considered prying into a household's private affairs. This means that some families are not even counted in the poll. Add this to the fact that some districts, including Englewood have gone paperless and a significant amount of homework assignments are posted on online.

I was a working high school student. I left school at twelve thirty and worked until 8 pm. I lived with a grandmother who could barely read and write. I earned my keep by helping her pay the rent and buy grocery. I would not have been able to attend college without financial aid. My education was paid for by the Federal Government. (by the taxpayers) In my years as a teacher, I never forgot that. I worked later hours without coercion and I gave back. I am still giving back. I know a lot of people my age who feel the same way about the program that funded our education. It was a hard road to a college degree even with the aid from the government. I never thought of it as a handout. It was more like a hand up. I did the rest myself with a child strapped to my back, literally. The President of the State Board of Education was also an Educational Opportunity Fund (EOF) student. You would be surprised at the number of people who have a little Title I in their backgrounds.